Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:56 +0200Need to copy the code also to 3.0 version
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:56 +0200] rev 171
Need to copy the code also to 3.0 version

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:54 +0200It always surprises me how things change when one really tries to implemente them. The whole approach with non-monotinic evolution was uncompilable. We need a common super type for all the visitors\!
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:54 +0200] rev 170
It always surprises me how things change when one really tries to implemente them. The whole approach with non-monotinic evolution was uncompilable. We need a common super type for all the visitors\!

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:52 +0200Clean definition of the version using interfaces
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:52 +0200] rev 169
Clean definition of the version using interfaces

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:48 +0200Expose as less as possible - making constructor of Expression package private
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:48 +0200] rev 168
Expose as less as possible - making constructor of Expression package private

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:47 +0200In order to provide better navigation in the Visitor examples, I will prefix them with a number
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:47 +0200] rev 167
In order to provide better navigation in the Visitor examples, I will prefix them with a number

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:44 +0200Last clashing code section for now. Time to sleep
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:44 +0200] rev 166
Last clashing code section for now. Time to sleep

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:42 +0200Duplicated code section
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:42 +0200] rev 165
Duplicated code section

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:37 +0200Closing up examples of visitor based on abstract class
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:37 +0200] rev 164
Closing up examples of visitor based on abstract class

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:36 +0200There was some mischmash between abstractclass and unknownvisit, hopefully fixing it
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:36 +0200] rev 163
There was some mischmash between abstractclass and unknownvisit, hopefully fixing it

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:35 +0200default traversal described
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:58:35 +0200] rev 162
default traversal described