Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:46:27 +0100Use scala 2.10.4 to compile on JDK8
Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tulach@apidesign.org> [Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:46:27 +0100] rev 408
Use scala 2.10.4 to compile on JDK8

Sun, 06 Oct 2013 22:05:14 +0200Looks like scala change URLs of its releases
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sun, 06 Oct 2013 22:05:14 +0200] rev 407
Looks like scala change URLs of its releases

Thu, 16 May 2013 08:18:24 +0200Yoshiki Shibata pointed out that collections were introduced in JDK 1.2
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Thu, 16 May 2013 08:18:24 +0200] rev 406
Yoshiki Shibata pointed out that collections were introduced in JDK 1.2

Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:17:53 +0100Bob pointed out that the extends bound is not necessary in Listable. Enough to have it in List.
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:17:53 +0100] rev 405
Bob pointed out that the extends bound is not necessary in Listable. Enough to have it in List.

Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:06:24 +0200Shorter lines
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:06:24 +0200] rev 404
Shorter lines

Sun, 02 Sep 2012 22:00:13 +0200Identifying code snippets to be used on my blog
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sun, 02 Sep 2012 22:00:13 +0200] rev 403
Identifying code snippets to be used on my blog

Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:16:57 +0200Example demostrating how to use trait to provide effective implementation of linked list while keeping encapsulation
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:16:57 +0200] rev 402
Example demostrating how to use trait to provide effective implementation of linked list while keeping encapsulation

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:52:45 +0200Using more descriptive name than arr per Petr Hejl's request
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:52:45 +0200] rev 401
Using more descriptive name than arr per Petr Hejl's request

Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:14:44 +0200Use indentation four
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:14:44 +0200] rev 400
Use indentation four

Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:55:35 +0200Was this a reverted condition? It seems that a code that can only be called be a test needs to be allowed when assertions are on.
Jaroslav Tulach <jtulach@netbeans.org> [Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:55:35 +0200] rev 399
Was this a reverted condition? It seems that a code that can only be called be a test needs to be allowed when assertions are on.
When assertions are off, it should throw IllegalStateException. Right?