2 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
4 * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
5 * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
6 * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this
7 * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
8 * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
10 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
11 * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
12 * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
13 * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
14 * accompanied this code).
16 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
17 * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
18 * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
20 * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
21 * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
26 * This file is available under and governed by the GNU General Public
27 * License version 2 only, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
28 * However, the following notice accompanied the original version of this
31 * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
32 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
33 * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
36 package java.util.concurrent;
39 * A recursive result-bearing {@link ForkJoinTask}.
41 * <p>For a classic example, here is a task computing Fibonacci numbers:
44 * class Fibonacci extends RecursiveTask<Integer> {
46 * Fibonacci(int n) { this.n = n; }
50 * Fibonacci f1 = new Fibonacci(n - 1);
52 * Fibonacci f2 = new Fibonacci(n - 2);
53 * return f2.compute() + f1.join();
57 * However, besides being a dumb way to compute Fibonacci functions
58 * (there is a simple fast linear algorithm that you'd use in
59 * practice), this is likely to perform poorly because the smallest
60 * subtasks are too small to be worthwhile splitting up. Instead, as
61 * is the case for nearly all fork/join applications, you'd pick some
62 * minimum granularity size (for example 10 here) for which you always
63 * sequentially solve rather than subdividing.
68 public abstract class RecursiveTask<V> extends ForkJoinTask<V> {
69 private static final long serialVersionUID = 5232453952276485270L;
72 * The result of the computation.
77 * The main computation performed by this task.
79 protected abstract V compute();
81 public final V getRawResult() {
85 protected final void setRawResult(V value) {
90 * Implements execution conventions for RecursiveTask.
92 protected final boolean exec() {